Evidence Hub

Metformin + Insulin vs. Insulin for GDM and T2DM during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Hallack C, Nogueira BV, Bomfim M, Meireles N, Martins W

Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2026

2,420 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding metformin to insulin (M+I) versus insulin alone for pregnant women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), focusing on stillbirth as the primary outcome. Sources of data: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched. No date limits. Last search: January 2025. Eligibility criteria: Randomized clinical trials including women with T2DM or GDM were eligible. Trials restricted to type 1 diabetes were excluded. Data collection and synthesis: Two reviewers extracted maternal and neonatal outcomes and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Data were pooled with random-effects models and reported as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Nine RCTs (2,420 women) were included, most with GDM and some with T2DM. Moderate-quality evidence indicated reduced stillbirth risk with M+I (6 RCTs, 2,196 participants; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14–0.90; NNT 111). Low-quality evidence suggested lower risks of gestational hypertension (4 RCTs; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.97) and neonatal hypoglycemia (7 RCTs; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.80). No significant differences were found for cesarean section, preterm delivery, or other neonatal outcomes. Heterogeneity, baseline imbalances, and small samples limited certainty. Conclusions: M+I may reduce stillbirth and some adverse outcomes compared with insulin alone,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,420 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free