Evidence Hub

Correlates of Mental Defeat in Individuals with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain on Long-term Opioid Therapy

Yoonjae Lee, Nicholas A. Giordano, Peggy A Compton, Nicole K Y Tang, Rosemary C. Polomano, Martin D. Cheatle

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2025

744 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) often present with significant challenges that can impact physical, psychological, and social well-being. Mental defeat is a critical consequence of CNCP being a known predictor of suicidality. This study examines the relationships between specific psychological and coping factors and mental defeat among individuals with CNCP on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of secondary data.

SETTING

Primary care, pain, and substance abuse clinics in Pennsylvania, Washington, and Utah.

SUBJECTS

744 adults with CNCP receiving LTOT (≥ 6 months).

METHODS

Anxiety and depression symptoms and pain coping strategies were examined with hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis to describe their relationship to mental defeat. In an exploratory analysis, we also stratified the sample by the presence of opioid use disorder (OUD) to determine if the associations were differently represented.

RESULTS

After controlling for covariates, anxiety (β = 7.07, P < 0.001) and depression symptoms (β = 14.17, P < 0.001) were statistically significant correlates of increased mental defeat. Diverting attention (β = 0.31, P < 0.05), coping self-statements (β= -0.30, P < 0.05), and catastrophizing (β = 1.47, P < 0.001) were significant correlates, explaining 51% of the variance in mental defeat (P < 0.001). Exploratory analysis revealed subgroup differences, such that while depression symptoms and catastrophizing were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 744 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free