Evidence Hub

Management Variation in Pediatric Labial Adhesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Riley J. O’Keefe, Sarah D. Compton, Melina L. Dendrinos, Monica W. Rosen

Jornal de Pediatria, 2025

159 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment and outcome differences between primary care providers (PCP), pediatric and adolescent gynecologists (PAG), and pediatric urologists (PUR) in management of labial adhesions (LA).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective, cohort study of patients aged 0 through 21 presenting for a clinic visit from July 2022 to July 2023 at a single institution, identified by ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for LA. Management variation was analyzed via cross-tabs with chi-square, Fisher's exact, and two-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

The 159 patients meeting inclusion criteria had a median age of 12 months at diagnosis; 81 were managed by a PCP and 78 were referred to a specialist: 41 (52.6%) PUR, 32 (41.0%) PAG, and 5 (6.4%) other specialists. Forty-one patients presented with urinary issues, with no difference in rate of referral to PUR (37.8%), PAG (15.5%), or continued PCP management (46.7%), P=.17. All patients were initially treated nonsurgically. Surgical intervention rates did not differ between PAG and PUR (P=.21). PUR performed sharp adhesiolysis more often than PAG (P=.011), but there was no difference in blunt adhesiolysis rates between PAG and PUR (P=.17). LA recurred postoperatively in 6 (3.8%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reiterate the efficacy of nonsurgical treatment for most patients with LA and illustrate minor variation in LA management between PAG and PUR.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free