Evidence Hub

Trends in adherence with a home blood pressure monitoring intervention among pregnant women in Ghana: A prospective cohort study

E. Lawrence, Perez Sepenu, Betty A. Nartey, C. Buxton, Andrea Pangori, R. Harfmann, Sarah D. Compton, T. Beyuo et al.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026

133 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates trends in adherence with home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in a cohort of Ghanaian pregnant women.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, participants were pregnant women receiving antenatal care at a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Participants were recruited at their initial antenatal visit and trained to use an automatic BP monitor. Until delivery, participants were instructed to check their BP daily, record values, and call a study nurse's phone line for clinical advice for elevated BPs. Home monitoring data were extracted from logs and analyzed over time.

RESULTS

The mean age of pregnant participants (n = 133) was 32 years; 28.6% were nulliparous, 8.3% had chronic hypertension, and 18.9% had a prior pregnancy complicated by a hypertensive disorder. From enrollment to delivery (mean 11.7 weeks), mean daily adherence with home BP monitoring was 73.7%, with a range from 0% to 100%. On average across all participants, the proportion of weeks with every day logged was 48.5%, the proportion of weeks with at least half of days logged was 74.1%, and the proportion of weeks with at least one day logged was 87.3%. Monitoring dropped off slowly over time, with over 50% of participants logging at least 1 day per week through delivery. Higher adherence was significantly associated with stillbirth in a prior pregnancy and a higher overall risk of a hypertensive disorder in the current pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Among pregnant women in Ghana, mean adherence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 133 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free