Evidence Hub

Low level lead exposure in early childhood and parental education on adolescent IQ and working memory: A cohort study

O. Halabicky, J. Pinto-Martin, Peggy Compton, Jianghong Liu

Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 2022

417 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Background The independent effect of lead exposure and parental education on children’s neurocognition is well-documented. However, few studies have examined the combined effect of childhood lead exposure and parental education on adolescent neurocognition, especially in China. Objective Examine both the combined and interactive effect of childhood blood lead levels (BLLs) and parental education on early adolescent neurocognition. Methods 417 children from a longitudinal cohort study in Jintan, China had BLLs measured at 3–5 years and 12 years, parental education levels assessed at 3–5 years, and neurocognitive outcomes tested at 12 years. Results BLLs at 3–5 years were inversely associated with adolescent IQ (β −0.55 95% CI: −0.97, −0.13) but not working memory (β −0.06 95% CI: −0.23, 0.11) and parental education was positively associated with adolescent IQ (β 0.68 95% CI: 0.19, 1.17) and working memory (β 0.24 95% CI: 0.04, 0.44). BLLs and parental education evidenced combined effects on neurocognition, where children with higher BLLs and lower fathers’ education had mean IQ scores 7.84 (95% CI: −13.15, −2.53) points lower than children with lower BLLs and higher fathers’ education. There were significant associations between parental education and working memory, however, not with BLLs. The interaction between mother and father high school education and BLLs was insignificant for effects on IQ and working memory. Significance Childhood lead exposure and parental education…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 417 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free