Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and safety of auricular therapy for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Li X, Xu S, Xie L, Kuang H, Liu J, Li Y

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

1,231 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Auricular therapy (AT) has attracted significant interest as a potential treatment for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AT in managing PCOS by analyzing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS: Eight electronic databases were searched from their inception until December 22, 2024. Two independent reviewers performed study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize data from included studies using mean differences (MDs). This study was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VBPSM).

RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis, which included 18 RCTs involving 1,231 patients with PCOS, found insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of AT as a stand-alone intervention for PCOS. However, AT used as an adjunct therapy exerted beneficial effects on PCOS outcomes. For AT combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula versus TCM formula alone, a reduction in body mass index (BMI) (MD: -0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.60 to -0.03, P = 0.04) was observed. Moreover, the reductions were associated with scores on the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) (MD: -3.81, 95% CI: -6.26 to -1.36, P = 0.002) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) (MD: -4.22, 95% CI: -7.74 to -0.69, P = 0.02). No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,231 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free