Evidence Hub

Baseline patient demographics for TETRIS: a prospective, noninterventional study to characterize the use of triple therapy for COPD in Germany

C. Vogelmeier, K. Beeh, P. Kardos, Thomas Paulsson, Gernot Rohde, H. Watz, Chris Compton, Tharishini Mohan et al.

Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, 2024

1,213 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Evidence on how decisions regarding escalation to triple therapy and de- or re-escalation are taken and the rationale on which these decisions are based is currently limited in Germany. Objectives: The TETRIS study aims to elucidate influences on treatment decisions surrounding triple therapy in a real-world practice setting in Germany. Design: TETRIS is an ongoing, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study recruiting patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with or without asthma who have already been treated with triple therapy for 2–48 weeks. Methods: For better representation of the treatment reality in Germany, patients are recruited from general practitioners and pulmonologists. Data are collected in two parts. Part 1 involves cross-sectional phenotyping of patients at enrollment. Part 2 involves a 2-year longitudinal follow-up period to monitor/document all visits by the patients during the 24-month observation period per routine clinical practice. Here, we report the demographic and baseline characteristics of 1213 eligible patients recruited to part 1 of the study. Results: The mean patient age was 66.4 years overall, and 29.3% (356/1213) of patients had no comorbidities. The mean CAT score was 19.4; the number of exacerbations and hospitalizations due to exacerbations in the past 3 years before starting triple therapy was 0.6 and 0.1, respectively. Dual bronchodilation with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,213 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free