Evidence Hub

Reconstructing Skeletal Homeostasis through Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis

Mathias Schäfersküpper, A. Simon, F. V. von Brackel, Maximilian M Delsmann, Anke Baranowsky, T. Schinke, M. Amling, T. Rolvien et al.

Blood, 2024

66 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal stem cell disease characterized by pronounced bone marrow fibrosis associated with extramedullary hematopoiesis and splenomegaly. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents the only curative treatment leading to MF regression. The involvement of skeletal homeostasis in the process of MF regression after allo-HSCT has remained unclear.

To delineate the dynamics leading to the resolution of MF after allo-HSCT we included 66 patients in this prospective cohort study of whom 40 (61%), 16 (24%), and 10 (15%) had primary myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera, respectively. Most patients showed advanced MF grade with 73% of patients having MF-3 at time of allo-HSCT. To understand the changes to the bone and the bone marrow we collected bone marrow trephine biopsies before and after transplantation; and blood and urine samples before and on day 30, 100 and 365 after transplantation. In addition, we assessed the bone status by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Measurements were compared to a bone-healthy cohort by propensity score matching.

DXA measurements showed highly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine compared to after allo-HSCT (T-score 1.4 ± 1.8 vs. 0.0 ± 1.2, P < 0.0001), often in the range of osteosclerosis. Similar results with even larger…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 66 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free