Evidence Hub

Inflammatory biomarker response to GLP-1 receptor agonists versus other glucose-lowering medications in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alrasheed T, Mostafa MEA, Madkhali MA, Khairy HA

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025

6,029 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is strongly linked to chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, which drive cardiovascular complications. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) demonstrate cardioprotective benefits that may extend beyond glycemic control, but their effects on key inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers compared to other glucose-lowering medications remain inconsistently reported across individual studies.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Databases were searched for RCTs comparing GLP-1 RAs against other antidiabetic drugs or placebo in adults with T2D, reporting changes in inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α]) or the oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde (MDA). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and outcomes were stratified by comparator type (placebo, insulin, other oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs]).

Results: Forty RCTs (n=6029 participants) were included. GLP-1 RA therapy significantly reduced CRP levels compared to placebo (SMD = -0.59; 95% CI: -0.84 to -0.34) and other OADs (SMD = -1.06; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.47). A significant reduction in TNF-α was observed versus placebo (SMD = -0.61; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.32) and oral antidiabetic drugs add on (SMD = -1.62; 95% CI: -2.86 to -0.38). Data for MDA were limited and showed a non-significant trend toward reduction. GLP-1 RAs also…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,029 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free