Evidence Hub

Estimating fiber orientation in ultrasound imaging through correlation and multivariate Granger causality

Mahshid Dodel, Adrian Basarab, François Varray

Comput. Biol. Medicine, 2025

Abstract

Estimating myocardial fiber orientation is essential for understanding the heart's microstructure and diagnosing conditions like arrhythmias or heart failure. While Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is the current gold standard, it is often unavailable in many clinical settings due to cost and accessibility. Ultrasound offers a promising alternative, especially through methods that analyze the spatial coherence of RF signals, such as Backscatter Tensor Imaging (BTI). However, most existing techniques rely on correlation, which can miss important directional dependencies in the signals. In this work, we investigate the use of multivariate Granger causality (GC) as a complementary tool for estimating ultrasound-based fiber orientation. We first develop a simulation framework based on vector autoregressive models that allows independent control of correlation and causality. This framework enables systematic evaluation of correlation, time-domain GC, and frequency-domain GC under different signal regimes, including the effect of preprocessing such as bandpass filtering. We show that correlation performs well in correlation-dominant conditions, and GC is more effective when causal dependencies dominate. Frequency-domain GC in particular demonstrated robustness to filtering, whereas time-domain GC was more sensitive to preprocessing. The methodology was further validated experimentally using an in vitro nylon-fiber phantom, imaged with a 1024-element matrix array probe and a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free