Evidence Hub

Comparison of the concomitant use of anti-obesity medications with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis

de Quadros LG, Neto MG, Coimbra CC, Teixieira A, Filho AC, Junior RLK, Dos Santos Neto MF, Pacca CC et al.

Surgical endoscopy, 2026

578 participants

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is increasingly combined with anti-obesity medications (AOMs), but the incremental benefit of combination therapy over ESG alone remains uncertain METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251179747). Comparative studies evaluating ESG plus AOMs versus ESG alone in adults with overweight or obesity were included. Random-effects models were used for pooled analyses RESULTS: Ten studies comprising 578 participants met inclusion criteria. At approximately seven months, combination therapy showed a modest, non-significant advantage in total weight loss (mean difference +1.9% TWL; 95% CI - 1.22 to 4.99), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 ≈ 80-90%). For metabolic outcomes, the pooled mean difference in HbA1c change was minimal (- 0.04%; 95% CI - 0.37 to 0.28; p = 0.79), and individual studies reported inconsistent effects CONCLUSIONS: ESG combined with AOMs may enhance early weight loss in selected settings; however, current evidence does not support consistent long-term superiority over ESG alone for weight or glycemic outcomes. Although the available data remain limited and heterogeneous, concomitant therapy may be considered in selected patients rather than as a universally superior strategy. Multicenter randomized trials with standardized pharmacotherapy protocols, longer follow-up, and improved patient stratification are needed to clarify durability,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 578 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free