Evidence Hub

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the evidence of pharmacological agents and growth factors in the regeneration of bony defects in chronic periodontitis

Koli S, Rathod S, Kolte A, Jaiswal P, Kotecha S

BMC oral health, 2026

393 participants

Abstract

Background: Periodontitis is a chronic, multifactorial infectious disease affecting the oral cavity, destroying the periodontal supporting tissues, including alveolar bone resorption and loss of clinical attachment. These changes can result in the formation of intrabony defects and if left untreated, it can ultimately result in tooth loss. To enhance periodontal regeneration, several pharmacologic agents-alendronate (ALN), rosuvastatin (RSV), atorvastatin (ATV), metformin (MF), and melatonin (ML)-have demonstrated promising osteoanabolic and anti-inflammatory effects. When combined with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), these agents may further enhance clinical and radiographic outcomes. This study aimed to assess the adjunctive benefits of various drug-PRF combinations on clinical attachment level (CAL) gain and bone fill (BF) in chronic periodontitis patients.

Methods: This network meta-analysis (NMA) adhered to PRISMA-NMA standards and was recorded in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42024600432). An extensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed/ Medline, Wiley Online Library, Embase, and CENTRAL databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published after 2016. The analysis included ten studies comprising RCTs with 393 participants containing intrabony or furcation region defects and follow-up periods of 6 and 9 months.

Results: PRF with MF demonstrated the highest efficacy for CAL gain (SUCRA 1.00), followed by PRF with ALN (0.60) and RSV (0.70). For bone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 393 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free