Evidence Hub

Health-related quality of life after risk-reducing hysterectomy (PRESCORES): a cross-sectional study

S. Oxley, Milly Lake, A. Dibden, Tia Whenham, Xia Wei, Lea Mansour, A. Kalra, Subhasheenee Ganesan et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2026

4,031 participants

Abstract

Summary Background Understanding the impact of risk-reducing hysterectomy (RRH) on health-related quality-of-life is essential for informed decision-making around endometrial cancer prevention and has not been previously investigated. This study aimed to estimate health-related utilities in women who received RRH. Methods PRESCORES was a multicentre cross-sectional study (ISRCTN17432105). We invited 4031 UK women ≥18 years with confirmed Lynch Syndrome, without prior gynaecological cancer, to participate between May 2023 and November 2024. The main outcome was a complete-case adjusted mean-difference in EQ-5D utility scores between participants who had undergone RRH or not, and by pre/post-menopausal age groups. Quality-of-life was measured at the time of survey completion, and retrospectively 4 months after surgery in the RRH-group. The Cancer–Worry Scale instrument was also evaluated by RRH group. Sensitivity analysis considered alternative statistical methods, multiple imputation, and restricting analysis to people 35–80 years. Findings Analysis included 1120 participants: 529 had undergone RRH with a median age of 55 years (IQR 48–62), compared with 39 years (33–52) without RRH. The RRH-group was significantly more likely to have had cancer, physical co-morbidities, be parous and used aspirin. Adjusted mean utilities were slightly lower in the RRH than no-RRH group (difference −0.020, 95% CI −0.045 to 0.004; p = 0.11), much lower for premenopausal women (−0.041, −0.074…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free