Evidence Hub

Metformin in non-diabetic patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Almeida V, Maciel L, Valverde Ramos AB, Sousa C, Ferraz M, Afonso L, Dibo P, Nunes I

BMC nephrology, 2025

213 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), which is caused mainly by mutations in the PKD1 or PKD2 genes, is a genetic disorder characterized by the growth of cysts and decreased kidney function. There is limited evidence on pharmacological interventions capable of slowing down disease progression in non-diabetic patients. Metformin, widely used to treat type 2 diabetes, has shown potential nephroprotective effects through activation of AMPK and inhibition of the mTOR pathway. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing metformin versus placebo or standard care in non-diabetic patients with ADPKD. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager, version 5.4, and R Software, version 4.4.2. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included, comprising 213 patients. Average follow-up ranged from 0.15 to 2 years. No significant differences were observed in the decline of kidney function (SMD: 0.19; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.46; p = 0.17) or in height-adjusted total kidney volume (htTKV) progression (SMD: 0.09; 95% CI, −0.20 to 0.38; p = 0.53). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent in the metformin group (RR: 2.93; 95% CI, 1.51 to 5.67; p = 0.0014), while the incidence of hypoglycemia did not differ between groups…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 213 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free