Evidence Hub

Association of calciprotein particles measured by a new method with coronary artery plaque in patients with coronary artery disease: A cross-sectional study

Jun Nakazato, S. Hoshide, Minoru Wake, Yutaka Miura, M. Kuro-o, K. Kario

Journal of Cardiology, 2019

71 participants · 34 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Calciprotein particles (CPPs) have been suggested to be associated with the degree of coronary atherosclerosis, and have also been established as a molecular marker for clinical outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there are several concerns with regard to conventional measurement of CPPs. We therefore developed a new CPP measurement system that can detect both smaller and lower-density CPPs.

METHODS

We analyzed 71 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n=29) and/or stable angina pectoris (AP, n=42) who did not have CKD of stage 4 or greater. CPP measurement was made using an infrared fluorescent bisphosphonate (OsteoSense, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and a gel filtration method. The coronary artery plaque was analyzed by gray-scale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and integrated backscatter (IB)-IVUS.

RESULTS

The median CPP level (interquartile range) was 40,953 (19,171-74,131) arbitrary units (AU). When we divided the CPP level into quintiles, the total and lipid plaque volume were incrementally higher with increasing quintile from lowest to highest (both p86,751AU) had significantly higher total plaque (263mm3 vs. 161mm3; p=0.001) and lipid plaque volume (156mm3 vs. 89mm3; p<0.001) than the other quintiles. However, these associations were not found for the fibrous or calcified plaque volume. The CPP level was higher in the ACS group than the stable AP group (p=0.02),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 71 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free