Evidence Hub

Analysis of corneal wavefront aberrations and corneal densitometry in eyes with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy

K. P. Kaiser, Jakob Wend, Myriam Böhm, T. Kohnen, Ingo Schmack

International ophtalmology, 2026

70 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

To investigate wavefront aberrations, as well as corneal optical densitometry (COD), in eyes with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (EBMD) and the influence on visual acuity. In this cross-sectional study, 70 eyes of 70 patients (mean age 55.9 ± 14.0 years) with the central cornea involving EBMD were compared to 50 healthy eyes of 50 patients (mean age 58.8 ± 14.1 years) serving as controls. Wavefront aberrations of the anterior corneal surface and the total cornea were measured with the Pentacam AXL (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and calculated for the 6 mm central corneal zone. In addition, the COD (corneal light backscatter measured in grey scale units) of the anterior 120 µm of the central 0–2 mm, 2–6 mm, and 6–10 mm of the cornea was evaluated. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was correlated with wavefront aberrations and COD using Spearman correlation analysis. EBMD resulted in significant higher peak-to-valley (PTV; median: 15.0 [interquartile range: 9] µm), square root of the sum of the squared higher-order aberrations (RMS-HOA; 0.77 [0.52] µm), astigmatism (1.06 [1.04] µm), coma (0.41 [0.44] µm), and trefoil (0.28 [0.40] µm) (all p ≤ 0.01). A moderate correlation was found especially between CDVA and PTV as well as RMS-HOA. EBMD led to a statistically significant higher COD (p < 0.01) in the central corneal 6-mm and correlated moderately with CDVA outcomes. Our study revealed a significant correlation between elevated wavefront aberrations…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 70 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free