Evidence Hub

Corneal high-order aberrations and backscatter in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy

Katrin Wacker, J. McLaren, Sejal Amin, K. Baratz, Sanjay V. Patel

Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2015

62 participants · 123 citations

Abstract

Purpose Suboptimal visual acuity after endothelial keratoplasty has been attributed to increased anterior corneal high-order aberrations (HOAs). In this study, we determined anterior and posterior corneal HOAs over a range of severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Design Cross-sectional study. Participants 108 eyes (62 subjects) with a range of severity of FECD and 71 normal eyes (38 subjects). Methods All corneas were examined by using slit-lamp biomicroscopy to determine the severity of FECD versus normality. FECD corneas were categorized as mild, moderate, or advanced according to the area and confluence of guttae and the presence of clinically visible edema. Normal corneas were devoid of any guttae. Wavefront errors from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were derived from Scheimpflug images and expressed as Zernike polynomials through the 6th order over a 6-mm-diameter optical zone. Backscatter from the anterior 120 μm and posterior 60 μm of the cornea were also measured from Scheimpflug images and were standardized to a fixed scatter source. Variables were compared between FECD and control eyes by using generalized estimating equation models to adjust for age and correlation between fellow eyes. Main Outcome Measures HOAs, expressed as root-mean-square of wavefront errors, and backscatter of the anterior and posterior cornea. Results Total anterior corneal HOAs were increased in moderate (0.61 ± 0.27 μm, mean ± standard deviation; p =0.01) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free