Evidence Hub

Age-stratified normative lens densitometry in children: zone-specific reference curves from 4-18 years

Rukiye Kilic Ucgul, K. Tekin, Esin Saygili, Sueda Nur Ozdemir, K. Teberik

Clinical and experimental optometry, 2026

188 participants

Abstract

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Quantitative evaluation of lens transparency may aid the clinical assessment of normal and abnormal lenticular changes during childhood.

BACKGROUND

Scheimpflug imaging enables objective measurement of crystalline lens light backscatter. While age-related increases in lens densitometry are well documented in adults, normative paediatric data remain limited. Because lens development in childhood differs fundamentally from adult cataractogenesis, age-stratified reference standards are required.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 188 eyes from 188 participants aged 4-18 years. Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR) was used to measure global and zone-specific lens densitometry (nucleus 0-2 mm, anterior cortex, posterior cortex, annulus 2-4 mm, annulus 4-6 mm). Demographic and biometric parameters, including visual acuity, refraction, keratometry, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and pupil diameter, were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age was 12.5 ± 3.6 years (range 4-18), with 53.2% male. Mean global lens density declined from 7.98 ± 0.41 in children aged 4-9 years, to 7.93 ± 0.21 in those aged 10-13 years, and further to 7.72 ± 0.50 in adolescents aged 14-18 years (p < 0.001). Nuclear density showed the steepest decrease, from 8.53 ± 0.57 to 8.23 ± 0.28 and then 7.89 ± 0.29 across the three age groups (p < 0.001). Anterior cortical density increased slightly (7.25 ± 0.77 → 7.20 ± 0.58 → 7.53 ± 0.73, p = 0.028), while posterior cortical density rose…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 188 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free