Evidence Hub

Predicting the Prognosis of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy by Using Scheimpflug Tomography

Sanjay V. Patel, D. Hodge, Emily J Treichel, Matthew R. Spiegel, K. Baratz

Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020

56 participants · 90 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if Scheimpflug tomography pachymetry map and posterior elevation map patterns, central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal backscatter can predict the prognosis of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with follow-up of outcomes.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-six eyes (56 subjects) with a range of severity of FECD.

METHODS

Corneas were graded by cornea specialists according to the area and confluence of guttae and the presence of clinically definite edema. Masked and randomized Scheimpflug imaging pachymetry map and posterior elevation map patterns were assessed by 1 observer for loss of regular isopachs, displacement of the thinnest point of the cornea, and the presence of posterior surface depression. The prognosis of eyes over a 5-year (median) follow-up period was determined based on FECD progression (new onset of clinically definite edema or ≥5% increase in CCT) or intervention by endothelial keratoplasty. Cumulative probabilities of progression and intervention were estimated from survival analyses, with risk factors determined by using Cox proportional hazards models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pachymetry map and posterior elevation map patterns, corneal backscatter, and CCT (ultrasonic pachymetry).

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, loss of regular isopachs (hazard ratio [HR], 18.00) displacement of the thinnest point (HR, 11.53), focal posterior surface depression (HR, 10.21), and anterior corneal backscatter (HR, 1.22, per…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free