Evidence Hub

Weight Reduction Heterogenicity and Mediators of GLP-1RAs and Dual Agonists for Individuals With Obesity: A Meta-Analysis

Lu D, Li N, Yuan Z, Gao Y

Clinical obesity, 2026

40 participants

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dual agonists have become pivotal options for obesity, but marked weight loss heterogeneity remains poorly understood. This meta-regression analysis aimed to identify factors influencing this heterogeneity. We searched Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to February 1, 2026, enrolling 32 eligible trials (40 408 participants) following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed using R software. Pooled analysis showed that GLP-1RAs and dual agonists achieved a weighted mean weight reduction of 9.36% (95% CI 7.92%-10.80%), with high interstudy heterogeneity (I2 = 99.6%, p 2 = 81.34%). Comorbid Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) were negatively correlated with treatment response (all p < 0.05). Emotional state and metabolic comorbidities including T2DM, OSA and MAFLD are important influencing factors of the interindividual differences of weight loss efficacy of GLP-1RAs and dual agonists, providing evidence for personalized obesity management.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free