Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy and safety of Glucagon-like pepetide-1 receptor agonists with metformin in Asian versus non-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Li W, Huang L, Wang R, Peng P, Song A, Zeng Y, Zhang Z

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025

1,096 participants

Abstract

AIMS: In type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in combination with metformin show better efficacy than metformin alone. Nevertheless, the reactions of different ethnic groups, especially Asian and non-Asian populations, are still controversial. To give clinical medication usage an evidence-based foundation, this meta-analysis examined GLP-1RAs' safety and efficacy when combined with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Up to January 2025, systematic searches for randomised controlled trials were carried out in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed and Wanfang comparing GLP-1RA/metformin combination versus metformin alone in type 2 diabetes, with subgroup analyses for Asian versus non-Asian cohorts. RevMan version 5.3 was used for analyses, and the Cochrane tools for risk of bias were used for quality assessment.

RESULTS: This meta-analysis comprised 11 papers in total (6 Asian trials: 750 people; 5 non-Asian trials: 1096 people). After treatment of GLP-1RAs combined with metformin, the Asian group showed greater improvement in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (weighted mean differences [WMD], -1.09; 95% confidence intervals [CI], -1.48 to -0.71; subgroup heterogeneity: I2 = 77.7%, p < 0.05) and weight (WMD, -4.16; 95% CI -6.11 to -2.22; subgroup heterogeneity: I2 = 89.5%, p < 0.05) with a lower gastrointestinal (GI) events risk (relative risks, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.22; subgroup…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,096 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free