Evidence Hub

Eosinophilic folliculitis, eosinophilic dermatosis of hematologic malignancy and acneiform follicular mucinosis: Two case reports and a review of the literature highlighting the spectrum of histopathology

C. Bailey, Douglas A. Laurain, D. Sheinbein, Heather A Jones, L. Compton, I. Rosman

Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2020

4 citations

Abstract

Within the literature, there is overlap in the histopathological features described in eosinophilic folliculitis associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), eosinophilic dermatosis of hematologic malignancy, and acneiform follicular mucinosis. These disorders are described with varying degrees of superficial and deep lymphocytic and eosinophilic inflammation demonstrating perivascular, perifollicular, and folliculocentric involvement with or without follicular mucin deposition. Given significant histopathological overlap, these diagnoses may represent a continuum on a spectrum of dermatoses. Here, we present two cases with histopathological elements that reflect components of this clinicopathological spectrum and compare our findings with previously reported cases to compare and contrast reported features. Our first case is a 71‐year‐old African American man with long‐standing CLL who developed a pruritic erythematous papular eruption on the face and chest with biopsy revealing a dense folliculotropic lymphocytic infiltrate with conspicuous eosinophils and follicular mucinosis. Our second case is a 70‐year‐old Caucasian man recently diagnosed with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma who developed an erythematous papular rash on the neck and face with biopsy revealing superficial and deep perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation with scattered eosinophils. Characterization of our two cases and comparison with available literature suggest that these disorders…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free