Evidence Hub

Associations Between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lalani I, Nambayan R, Carbonell C, Ruan Y, O'Sullivan DE, Stukalin I, Hilsden RJ, Brenner DR

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 2026

Abstract

IntroductionUse of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for control of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction is increasing. Given the established link between obesity and multiple cancers, there is growing interest in the potential effects of GLP-1RAs on cancer risk reduction. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between GLP-1RA use and cancer incidence.MethodsWe conducted literature searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, covering publications up to September 17th, 2025. Our review included studies among adults receiving GLP-1RAs for any indication that reported effects on cancer incidence of any type.ResultsAmong 1,644 unique citations identified, 139 studies met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. After study exclusion, a total of 78 observational studies were included in the review and meta-analysis. GLP-1RA use was associated with statistically significant reductions in cancer risk for 10 of 13 obesity-associated cancers, specifically colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, gallbladder, liver, ovarian, pancreatic and stomach cancers along with meningioma and multiple myeloma. Compared to insulin specifically, GLP-1RAs provided protective effects against cancer of the colorectum (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.66), liver (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.62), and pancreas (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.48). The risk of developing thyroid cancer was slightly elevated, but not statistically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free