Evidence Hub

Inter-platform Reproducibility of Ultrasonic Attenuation and Backscatter Coefficients in assessing NAFLD

A. Han, Yingzhen N Zhang, A. Boehringer, M. André, J. Erdman, R. Loomba, C. Sirlin, W. O'Brien

European Radiology, 2019

41 citations

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess inter-platform reproducibility of ultrasonic attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) estimates in adults with known/suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).MethodsThis HIPAA-compliant prospective study was approved by an institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Participants with known/suspected NAFLD were recruited and underwent same-day liver examinations with clinical ultrasound scanner platforms from two manufacturers. Each participant was scanned by the same trained sonographer who performed multiple data acquisitions in the right liver lobe using a lateral intercostal approach. Each data acquisition recorded a B-mode image and the underlying radio frequency (RF) data. AC and BSC were calculated using the reference phantom method. Inter-platform reproducibility was evaluated for AC and log-transformed BSC (logBSC = 10log10BSC) by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s correlation, Bland-Altman analysis with computation of limits of agreement (LOAs), and within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV; applicable to AC).ResultsSixty-four participants were enrolled. Mean AC values measured using the two platforms were 0.90 ± 0.13 and 0.94 ± 0.15 dB/cm/MHz while mean logBSC values were − 30.6 ± 5.0 and − 27.9 ± 5.6 dB, respectively. Inter-platform ICC was 0.77 for AC and 0.70 for log-transformed BSC in terms of absolute agreement. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.81 for AC and 0.80 for…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free