Evidence Hub

Comparative Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns among Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Referral Hospitals in Chad and Cameroon

Junior TL, BODERING A, Ouangkaké N, Gamougam K, Henry YF, Elsa MN, Florence MND

2026

300 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogenic bacteria is a major public health concern worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where surveillance data remain limited. This study compared the antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urinary tract infections (UTIs) at the National Reference University Hospital Center (CHU-RN), Chad, and the Military Region Hospital N°1 (HMR1), Cameroon. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February to July 2025. Midstream urine specimens were collected from 300 patients at CHU-RN and 250 patients at HMR1. Only one isolate per patient was retained for analysis. Bacterial identification was performed using standard culture methods and the API 20E system. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion on Müller-Hinton agar and interpreted according to CA-SFM/EUCAST 2025 breakpoints. Results Among 300 urine samples analyzed at CHURN and 250 at HMR1, culture positivity rates were 31.7% and 22.0%, respectively. E. coli was the predominant pathogen, accounting for 19.3% of isolates at CHURN and 10.8% at HMR1, followed by K. pneumoniae at 6.7% and 6.0%, respectively. Most patients at CHU-RN were male (66.0%), whereas females predominated at HMR1 (64.4%). High resistance rates were observed for amoxicillin (70.5–95.0%) and amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (52.0–75.0%) in both bacterial species.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free