Evidence Hub

Infected clitoral smegmatic pseudocysts

Abankwa A, Squires N, Leung A, Husk K

BMJ case reports, 2026

Abstract

Smegmatic pseudocysts are a source of clitoral pain and dyspareunia, contributing to sexual dysfunction. Its presentation as a large, painful clitoral mass and its non-surgical management have not been described. A patient in her 40's presented with clitoral pain, dysuria, dyspareunia, and a 2-cm clitoral mass. On examination, the mass was found to be a smegmatic pseudocyst collection and was expressed safely. The smegma also returned positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa She completed a 7-day course of levofloxacin, and at subsequent follow-ups, her pain resolved. For prevention, she was counseled on appropriate hygiene and topical estrogen use. With this presentation, a thorough physical examination is warranted to rule out smegmatic pseudocysts. Once superinfection has been confirmed, treatment with the appropriate antibiotics can help with symptomatic relief. Additionally, in-office expression can be considered for immediate pain relief. Infected smegmatic pseudocysts can be safely managed conservatively, reducing unnecessary surgical procedures for removal.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free