Evidence Hub

Effects of exercise, metformin and their combination on glucose metabolism in individuals with abnormal glycaemic control: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Tong Zhao, Qi-Ze Yang, J. F. Feuerbacher, Bi-Zhu Yu, Christian Brinkmann, Sulin Cheng, Wilhelm Bloch, M. Schumann

British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2024

33 participants · 32 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of exercise, metformin and their combination on glucose metabolism in individuals with abnormal glycaemic control.

DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE and SPORTDiscus.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials involving exercise, metformin or their combined treatments in individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were included. Outcomes included haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), 2-hour glucose during oral glucose tolerance test, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

RESULTS: 407 articles with 410 randomised controlled trials (n=33 802) were included. In prediabetes, the exercise showed greater efficacy than metformin on HbA1c levels (mean difference -0.16%, 95% CI (-0.23 to -0.09) vs -0.10%, 95% CI (-0.21 to 0.02)), 2-hour glucose (-0.68 mmol/L, 95% CI (-0.97 to -0.39) vs 0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI (-0.38 to 0.41)) and HOMA-IR (-0.54, 95% CI (-0.71 to -0.36) vs -0.23, 95% CI (-0.55 to 0.10)), while the efficacy on fasting glucose was comparable (-0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI (-0.32 to -0.19) vs -0.33 mmol/L, 95% CI (-0.45 to -0.21)). In T2DM, metformin was more efficacious than exercise on HbA1c (-0.88%, 95% CI (-1.07 to -0.69) vs -0.48%, 95% CI (-0.58 to -0.38)), 2-hour glucose (-2.55 mmol/L, 95% CI (-3.24 to -1.86) vs -0.97 mmol/L, 95% CI (-1.52 to -0.42)) and fasting glucose (-1.52 mmol/L, 95% CI (-1.73…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 33 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free