Evidence Hub

Occurrence of pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs and PFAS in global surface waters: A meta-analysis-based review

Joshua R. Monk, Peter S. Hooda, Rosa Busquets, D. Sims

Environmental Pollution, 2025

27 citations

Abstract

Emerging contaminants (ECs) have been recognized as a new class of water contaminants and their occurrence in surface water is a concern for ecosystems and society. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive systematic review based meta-analysis of ECs in global surface waters and associated ecological risks. With a special focus on pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs (PIDs), and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases were screened to retrieve articles published between 2013 and 2024. One hundred-one articles comprising 714 datasets spanning 70 PIDs and PFASs in surface water across 46 countries were included in the meta-analysis study. Global PID concentrations ranged from 0.02 ng/L to 82,188 ng/L, with metformin (MFN) having the highest meta-analyzed median concentration of 729.4 ng/L. Antibiotics, analyzed separately revealed sulfonamides as the most detected. Our analysis showed that PIDs (including antibiotics) levels were in the upper quartiles in low-income settings where wastewater treatment is scarce, whereas in most situations where secondary treatments are utilized, their levels tended to remain in the lower quartile. Wastewater treatment beyond a secondary level can reduce these chemicals to levels which present little to no environmental impact. Global PFAS concentrations ranged from 0.01 ng/L to 311.25 ng/L with perfluoroalkylcarboxylic acids (PFCAs) being the most commonly occurring PFAS.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free