Evidence Hub

Hepatitis C Screening in Emergency Departments: The DETECT Hep C Randomized Clinical Trial

Haukoos J, Rothman RE, Galbraith JW, Hopkins E, Hsieh YH, Lyle C, Gravitz S, Kamis KF et al.

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2025

73 participants · 28 citations

Abstract

Importance

Identification of individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a public health priority. Emergency departments (EDs) have been a focus of screening efforts, as they serve large numbers of at-risk patients who commonly do not access health care elsewhere. However, the optimal approach to HCV screening in ED settings remains unknown.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of HCV screening in EDs with the hypothesis that nontargeted screening identifies more new diagnoses than targeted screening.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prospective, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial performed at 3 urban EDs in Denver, Colorado; Baltimore, Maryland; and Jackson, Mississippi. Patients were 18 years or older, with exclusions for critical illness, inability to provide consent, or previously diagnosed HCV.

Interventions

As part of routine ED care, patients were randomly assigned to undergo either nontargeted screening, in which HCV testing was offered regardless of risk, or targeted screening, in which testing was offered based on risk assessment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was newly diagnosed HCV infection (RNA detected). Secondary outcomes were repeat HCV diagnoses; HCV test offer, acceptance, and completion; HCV genotype and fibrosis staging; components of the HCV care continuum; and all-cause mortality through 18 months of follow-up. Analyses were conducted from January to March 2025 by intention-to-treat analysis, using relative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 73 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free