Evidence Hub

CFTR modulators and pregnancy outcomes: Early findings from a nationwide cohort study

L. Chouchana, Mathis Collier, Clémence Martin, Pierre-Régis Burgel, J. Tréluyer

Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2025

20 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recent therapeutic advances, mainly with the advent of CFTR modulators, have been associated with an increasing number of pregnancies in females with cystic fibrosis (fwCF). This study aimed to evaluate the safety of the use of CFTR modulators, specifically elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) during pregnancy.

METHODS

A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS), covering nearly all singleton pregnancies ending between January 2018 and December 2023. Exposure to CFTR modulators was defined as using prescriptions through pregnancy, including one month in the preconception period. The study compared pregnancy outcomes amongst fwCF between pregnancies exposed and unexposed to CFTR modulators.

RESULTS

Among 590 pregnancies in fwCF, 148 (24.7 %) were exposed to CFTR modulators, including 136 during first trimester. Of these, 147 (99.3 %) resulted in livebirths. The most common CFTR modulator used was ELX/TEZ/IVA, in 121 (81.8 %) pregnancies. The prevalence of major birth defects was similar between exposed and unexposed fwCF (3.38 % vs. 4.66 %; p = 0.72). The rate of small for gestational age (SGA, <10th percentile) was significantly lower in pregnancies exposed compared to unexposed (6.8 % vs. 16.1 %; p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

The study provides early reassurance about the safety of CFTR modulators during pregnancy, particularly in terms of teratogenicity and adverse pregnancy outcomes. While findings suggest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free