Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy of GLP-1 RAs/SGLT-2 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes according to baseline use of metformin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Zhang Y, Li Z, Hao Y

European journal of medical research, 2025

81,738 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are recommended along with metformin for the potential cardiovascular benefits among type 2 diabetes. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether the effects of SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes are consistent with and without baseline metformin use.

METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials with SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RAs as interventions of type 2 diabetes patients up to June, 2024. The main outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular death. Both random-effects model and fixed model were adopted to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS: A total of 81,738 patients (median age: 62-66 years, 53.7-71.5% men, median follow-up: 1.3-5.4 years) from 11 studies (7 studies of SGLT-2i and 4 of GLP-1 RAs) were included in the study. The metformin-naive portions ranged from 28.90% to 81.98%. Among patients using metformin at baseline, SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE risk (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, P = 0.02). In metformin-naive patients, similar reductions were observed (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, P = 0.01). No statistically significant interaction was found between metformin users and non-users for any outcome (all P values for interaction > 0.05), indicating consistent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 81,738 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free