Evidence Hub

Dapagliflozin & pioglitazone combination therapy in T2DM with or without MASLD - a systematic review and meta-analysis: PRO-2 study

Joshi S, Samajdar SS, Gupta A, Bhartia M, Lodha S, Bhattacharyya S, Seshadri K, Nagendra L et al.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2026

1,411 participants

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin plus pioglitazone versus comparators on metabolic control and hepatic steatosis in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with or without metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Web of Science with a search updated through January 2026, following peer review. Eligible studies enrolled adults with T2DM with or without MASLD, receiving dapagliflozin plus pioglitazone in comparison with standard care or monotherapy, or as pooled-arm exploratory estimates. The primary outcome was glycemic control (HbA1c and fasting and postprandial glucose levels). Secondary outcomes included body weight, insulin resistance indices, related liver outcomes (liver fat content, NAFLD activity score [NAS], and steatohepatitis resolution), liver enzymes, non-invasive fibrosis indices, lipid parameters, and safety outcomes.

Results: Thirteen studies (n = 1411) met the inclusion criteria. Dapagliflozin-pioglitazone significantly improved glycemic control, with a reduction in HbA1c (mean difference -0.49%; 95% CI -0.64 to -0.34), and Fasting Blood Glucose (-11.96 mg/dL; 95% CI -16.30 to -7.62) and Post-Prandial Glucose (-21.54 mg/dL; 95% CI -30.84 to -12.24). Hepatic outcomes also improved, with reductions in liver fat content (standardized mean difference -0.42; 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,411 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free