Evidence Hub

CD30+ lymphomatoid drug reactions

Pulitzer MP, Nolan KA, Oshman RG, Phelps RG

The American Journal of dermatopathology, 2013

Abstract

We report 5 cases of cutaneous CD30+ lymphomatoid drug reactions that occurred shortly after the onset of drug exposure and resolved promptly upon withdrawal of the offending agents. The cases showed protean dermatologic manifestations ranging from diffuse erythema with desquamation to macules, papules, and annular plaques. The suspect drugs were amlodipine (a calcium channel blocker) for 2 cases, sertraline (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) for 1 case, gabapentin for 1 case, and levofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone) versus cefepime (a fourth generation cephalosporin), and metoprolol (a beta blocker), in the fifth case. The histopathologic findings included varying combinations of spongiotic dermatitis, lichenoid infiltrates, and interface dermatitis with a dermal infiltrate of large atypical lymphocytes. Three of the 5 cases contained as much as 30% CD30+ staining of all lymphocytes, whereas the remaining 2 showed 5%-15% positivity. Three patients had a history of allergy or immune dysregulation. Increased knowledge of CD30 positivity in lymphomatoid drug reactions may be relevant in an era of targeted drug therapies. Recognition of these findings may help clinicians to tailor appropriate clinical evaluation and treatment including a review of medications and the removal of possible offending agents.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free