Evidence Hub

Effects of intermittent fasting on HbA1c and weight in insulin versus oral hypoglycemic therapy-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Al Qudah J, Beni ND, Ibrahim N, Khader S, Dempsey L, Butler AE

Frontiers in nutrition, 2026

1,441 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aim: Intermittent fasting (IF) has emerged as a beneficial dietary strategy for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with improvements in certain indicators of body composition and cardiometabolic health. However, limited research compares the different effects of IF in oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) versus insulin-treated patients.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (January 2010-January 2025). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults (>18-years) with T2DM undergoing IF, time-restricted feeding (TRF), alternate-day fasting (ARF), fasting-mimicking diets (FMD), and Ramadan fasting were included.

Results: In total, 12 studies (n = 1,441 participants) met the inclusion criteria. IF improved glycemic control in both groups, with HbA1c reductions of 0.54% in OHA-users and 2.8% in insulin-users. In the meta-analysis of four eligible trials (n = 280), IF produced a significant pooled reduction in HbA1c (-1.85, 95% CI: -2.86 to -0.84), despite substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 98.1%). In contrast, IF did not produce a significant change in body weight (-1.45 kg, 95% CI: -5.51 to 2.61; I2 = 96.7%). Most studies reported weight loss, with an average body mass index (BMI) reduction of 1.53 kg/m2 in OHA users. Among insulin-users, one study reported a significant reduction in weight for the IF group (-4.77 ± 4.99 kg, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: IF represents an effective adjuvant therapeutic strategy in T2DM and could…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,441 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free