Evidence Hub

Metformin for primary prevention of colorectal neoplasms in adenoma-free populations: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Shen M, Lu S, Xu Z, Zhou F, Sheng LT, Yu Q

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025

1,416,085 participants

Abstract

Background: Metformin shows promise in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursors, but evidence on its dose-response effect remains limited.

Aim: To determine the association between metformin therapy and colorectal neoplasms in adenoma-free individuals and characterize the dose-response relationship.

Methods: Adjusted effect estimates from each study were aggregated using a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses, publication bias assessment, sensitivity analyses and dose-response analyses were conducted.

Results: A total of 37 eligible studies, involving 1,416,085 participants, were included. Metformin significantly reduced colorectal neoplasms risk (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.85, Odds ratio (OR) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.87). Subgroup analyses demonstrated enhanced efficacy in Asian populations, younger patients (<60 years), and cohorts with ≥50% male participants. Dose-response analysis identified 331 mg/day as the optimal dose for CRC risk reduction (OR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.76-0.91). Each additional year of use reduced CRC risk by 3% (OR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.95-0.99).

Conclusion: Metformin demonstrates effective chemoprevention against colorectal neoplasms, where the inverse association was most prominent at low-dose, long-term therapy.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier CRD42023394042.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,416,085 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free