Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors in Rett Syndrome—What Physiological Markers Are Informative for Monitoring Disease States?

Jatinder Singh, Georgina Wilkins, Athina Manginas, Samiya Chishti, F. Fiori, Girish D Sharma, J. Shetty, P. Santosh

Italian National Conference on Sensors, 2025

7 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Rett syndrome (RTT) presents with a wide range of symptoms spanning various clinical areas. Capturing symptom change as the disorder progresses is challenging. Wearable sensors offer a non-invasive and objective means of monitoring disease states in neurodevelopmental disorders. The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to critically appraise the literature on the use of wearable sensors in individuals with RTT. The PRISMA criteria were used to search four databases without time restriction and identified 226 records. After removing duplicates, the titles and abstracts of 184 records were screened, 147 were excluded, and 37 were assessed for eligibility. Ten (10) articles remained, and a further two were included after additional searching. In total, 12 articles were included in the final analysis. The sample size ranged from 7 to 47 subjects with an age range of 1 to 41 years. Different wearable biosensor devices were used across studies, with the Empatica E4 wearable device being most frequently used in 33% (4/12) of the studies. All the studies demonstrated a high methodological quality with a low risk of bias. Evidence from wearable sensors, combined with machine learning methods, enabled the prediction of different sleep patterns and clinical severity in RTT. Given the small sample size and the limitations of available data for training machine learning models, we highlight areas for consideration. The review emphasises the need to enhance…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free