Evidence Hub

Effects of metformin plus gliclazide compared with metformin alone on circulating endothelial progenitor cell in type 2 diabetic patients

Chen LL, Liao YF, Zeng TS, Yu F, Li HQ, Feng Y

Endocrine, 2010

24 participants

Abstract

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play an important role in the development and progression of diabetic vascular complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of gliclazide plus metformin (GLIMET) compared with metformin alone (MET) on number and function of circulating EPCs in T2DM patients. Patients with newly diagnosed T2DM were randomly divided into two groups, receiving the following treatments for 16 weeks: MET group (assuming metformin 500-2500 mg/day, n=24) and GLIMET group [assuming gliclazide (modified release, 30-60 mg/day)+metformin (250-1000 mg/day), n=23]. Circulating EPCs were quantified by flow cytometry, and the ability to uptake LDL and stain for lectin were used as another method of characterizing EPCs ex vivo. The functions of circulating EPCs were evaluated by colony-forming units (CFU) and migration. The status of oxidative stress was analyzed by serum-free malonaldehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics and number and function of circulating EPCs between two groups at baseline. Glycemic responses were similar after treatments. Compared with MET group, GLIMET group was associated with an increase in circulating EPCs number, DiLDL-lectin-positive EPCs, and migration. The mean improvements in MDA and SOD of GLIMET group were more strongly upregulated than those of MET group. This study demonstrated that both metformin mono-treatment and metformin plus…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free