Evidence Hub

Enzalutamide Plus Metformin Versus Enzalutamide Alone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial (SAKK 08/14)

Gillessen S, Gobat K, Cathomas R, Fischer N, Pereira Mestre R, Hermanns T, Rothschild SI, Mach N et al.

European urology oncology, 2026

84 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to determine whether the addition of metformin to enzalutamide can improve the outcomes of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS: From 2016 to 2021, patients with mCRPC were randomized to receive enzalutamide plus metformin or enzalutamide alone, with body mass index (BMI) as a stratification factor. Primary end point was disease-control rate (DCR) at 15 mo. Secondary end points included event-free survival (EFS), time to prostate-specific antigen progression (TTPSAP) or radiologic progression (TTRP), and overall survival (OS). Post hoc analyses include tumor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-protein expression.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Enzalutamide plus metformin (n = 84) did not increase DCR or secondary end points compared with enzalutamide alone (n = 82; DCR 52% vs 56%, p = 0.64). Post hoc analysis suggests that addition of metformin to enzalutamide may improve TTPSAP (p = 0.0074) in patients with PTEN-expressing tumor (n = 64), but not in patients with PTEN-negative tumor (n = 65, p > 0.6). Patients who were overweight/obese at baseline (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) had better DCR, OS, EFS, TTPSAP, and TTRP than patients with BMI <25 kg/m2, independent of treatment arm (p < 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The addition of metformin to enzalutamide did not improve the study end points in the whole study cohort. PTEN status as a potential predictive biomarker and the obesity…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free