Evidence Hub

First-Line Dapagliflozin, Metformin, or Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: Vascular and Molecular Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial

Chee YJ, Acharyya S, Liew H, Seow CJ, Goh LL, Boehm BO, Dalan R

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

21 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims: The optimal first-line pharmacological therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains uncertain. This trial compared the vascular and molecular effects of dapagliflozin monotherapy, metformin monotherapy, and their combination in this population.

Materials and methods: Sixty participants were randomised 1:1:1 to metformin 500 mg twice daily (n = 19), dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (n = 20), or dapagliflozin-metformin combination (n = 21) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) from baseline. Secondary endpoints were pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), analysed by ANCOVA. Exploratory sphingolipid and proteomics profiling was performed using partial least squares discriminant analysis and ROC curve analysis.

Results: RHI did not differ significantly between groups (primary endpoint). Dapagliflozin produced significantly greater CIMT reduction versus metformin as a secondary endpoint (-0.058 mm; 95% CI -0.106 to -0.010; p = 0.018). PWV changes were non-significant between groups. Sphingolipid profiling identified dapagliflozin-specific downregulation of pro-inflammatory lactosylceramide species, particularly LacCer(d18:0) (AUC 0.814). Proteomics revealed upregulation of EpCAM and downregulation of endothelial adhesion molecules (JAM-A, PECAM-1, vWF) and tissue plasminogen activator with dapagliflozin compared with metformin.

Conclusions: In treatment-naïve newly diagnosed T2DM,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free