Evidence Hub

Metformin enhances the pathological response in nondiabetic patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial

Awad OM, Saber MA, Ali Sholkamy NH, Abdel-Azeez AM, Sadek EM, Mady FM

The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2026

43 participants

Abstract

This randomized, single-blind controlled pilot phase II trial evaluated whether adding metformin to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates in nondiabetic patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Eighty-five nondiabetic patients treated between May 2024 and June 2025 were randomized to receive standard nCRT-radiotherapy 50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions with concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily (group A, n = 43)-or the same regimen plus oral metformin 1000 mg twice daily (group B, n = 42). Metformin was started 1 to 2 weeks before nCRT and continued until 30 days after completion. The primary endpoint was pCR, defined as the absence of residual tumor in the resected specimen; a composite endpoint combining pCR and clinical complete response (cCR) was also assessed. Group B achieved a significantly higher pCR rate than group A (28% vs 9%, P = .010). The combined pCR/cCR outcome was likewise superior in the metformin group (38% vs 14%, P = .011). In multivariable logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders, metformin remained an independent predictor of combined pCR/cCR (adjusted odds ratio 3.98, P = .031). Metformin added to nCRT appears to enhance tumor response and early clinical outcomes in nondiabetic patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and may represent a low-cost, low-toxicity radiosensitizer. Larger, long-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings and clarify their…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free