Evidence Hub

Metabolic profiling of healthy vs. syndrome-associated obesity and effects of six-month metformin therapy

Halabitska I, Kamyshna I, Petakh P, Krynytska I, Putilin D, Kamyshnyi O

Acta diabetologica, 2026

78 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity includes a wide range of metabolic conditions. Some patients remain metabolically healthy despite excess body weight (MHO phenotype), while others develop metabolic syndrome and metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). These differences may determine the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The present study compared clinical and biochemical characteristics between people with MHO and those with MetS combined with MAFLD, and evaluated the effects of six months of metformin therapy in the latter group. METHODS: A total of 78 adults with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) were examined. Participants were classified as MHO (n = 26) or as having metabolic syndrome with MAFLD (n = 52). Anthropometric data, glucose and lipid metabolism indicators, liver enzymes, and non-invasive measures of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis (CAP, FIB-4, HSI) were recorded. Patients with MetS + MAFLD were randomized to lifestyle modification (Mediterranean diet and moderate exercise) or the same program plus metformin (500 mg twice daily) for six months. RESULTS: After six months, patients in the metformin group showed significant improvements in fasting glucose (− 0.9 ± 0.4 mmol/L, p < 0.001), HbA1c (− 0.5 ± 0.2%, p < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (p < 0.001), accompanied by modest weight reduction (− 1.6 ± 0.8 kg, p = 0.02). ALT and AST decreased (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), and CAP values fell by 9% (p = 0.004). Fibrosis indices FIB-4 and HSI both improved…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 78 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free