Evidence Hub

Tirzepatide Versus Intensified Conventional Care After 2 Years of Treatment in Early Type 2 Diabetes : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Del Prato S, Heine RJ, Pérez Manghi FC, Hsia SH, Gomez-Valderas E, Zeytinoglu M, Razzoli E, Kiljanski J et al.

Annals of internal medicine, 2026

794 participants

Abstract

Background: Initiation of treatment with tirzepatide, a once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), early after a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) may establish better and more durable glycemic control than current treatment approaches per guidelines and clinical practice.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus intensified conventional care (ICC) in participants with early T2D who have inadequate glycemic control with diet, exercise, and metformin.

Design: Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 4 trial (SURPASS-EARLY). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05433584).

Setting: 78 sites in 10 countries.

Participants: 794 adults with at most 4 years of T2D history treated with metformin.

Intervention: Tirzepatide (15 mg or maximum tolerated dose) or ICC (including GLP-1RAs but excluding tirzepatide) used in clinical practice and supported by local treatment guidelines.

Measurements: The primary objective was to show the noninferiority of tirzepatide to ICC for change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 2 years. Secondary objectives were to show the superiority of tirzepatide for change in HbA1c, weight, and waist circumference.

Results: Tirzepatide was superior to ICC for mean changes from baseline to 2 years in HbA1c (-1.99 percentage points [95% CI, -2.12 to -1.87 percentage points] vs. -1.32 percentage points [CI, -1.44 to -1.19 percentage points]; estimated treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 794 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free