Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of anagliptin added to metformin and empagliflozin 25 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial with 28-week open-label extension

Moon JS, Han KA, Yu JM, Won JC, Kang JG, Park S, Park CY

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2026

200 participants

Abstract

AIMS

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anagliptin added to metformin and empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) inadequately controlled on dual therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, patients with T2DM (HbA1c 7.0-11.0 %) on metformin (≥1000 mg/day) and empagliflozin (25 mg/day) were randomized 1:1 to anagliptin (100 mg twice daily) or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by a 28-week open-label extension. The primary endpoint was HbA1c change from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

Of 200 randomized patients, 197 were analyzed (baseline HbA1c 7.76 %). At week 24, the least-squares mean HbA1c change was -0.83 % with anagliptin versus -0.03 % with placebo (difference -0.80 %; 95 % CI - 0.95 to - 0.64; P < 0.0001). The least-squares mean change in HOMA-β was + 10.45 versus -6.02 with placebo (between-group difference 16.46; P = 0.0003). Adverse events were similar between groups, with no severe hypoglycemia or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first placebo-controlled trial evaluating DPP-4 inhibitor addition to maximally dosed empagliflozin (25 mg) plus metformin, anagliptin significantly improved glycemic control and β-cell function with a favorable safety profile, supporting this triple combination as an effective intensification strategy.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free