Evidence Hub

The effect of oral magnesium supplementation on glycemic control and metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Al-Maqbali JS, Al Alawi AM, Osman A, Al-Farqani A, Kumar S, Al Futisi A, Al-Mamari A, Al-Zakwani I et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

247 participants

Abstract

Background: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed the effect of oral magnesium (Mg) supplementation on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and metabolic biomarkers in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial with intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Adults (≥18 years) with T2DM were randomized 1:1 to receive magnesium oxide (500 mg; 302 mg elemental) or placebo. Eligibility criteria included a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥7.0% and a creatinine clearance >30 mL/min. Simple randomization was performed using a sealed-envelope method. Biochemical and clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and at three follow-up visits over 12 months.

Results: A total of 247 participants were included in the ITT analysis (Mg-oxide, n=118; placebo, n=129). Median age was 58 (50-65) years, and median diabetes duration was 16 (10-22) years. Hypomagnesemia was present in 7.3% by ionized magnesium (iMg) and 8.1% by total magnesium (tMg). Mg-oxide supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood glucose in a subgroup of the cohort (FBG; p = 0.039) and resulted in a modest, non-significant reduction in HbA1c (-0.30% vs. -0.05%; p = 0.145), with a higher proportion achieving goal attainment/controlled HbA1c (p = 0.043). HbA1c reductions were more pronounced among participants with baseline hypomagnesemia (-0.60% vs. +0.25%; p = 0.074), or diabetes duration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 247 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free