Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of once-daily oral zenagamtide, a novel unimolecular GLP-1 and amylin receptor agonist, in adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial

Mora P, Aroda VR, Asong M, Blüher M, Carlander AF, Kaltoft M, Vilsen LN, Rosenstock J

Lancet (London, England), 2026

915 participants

Abstract

Background: Zenagamtide (formerly amycretin) is a unimolecular peptide agonist of GLP-1, amylin, and calcitonin receptors. We aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship with respect to the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral zenagamtide compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: This 36-week, randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial was conducted at 83 hospital and clinic sites across 11 countries. The trial consisted of a 3-week screening period, a 36-week intervention period, and a 4-week follow-up period. Adults (aged 18-75 years) with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7·0-10·0% [53-86 mmol/mol]), treated with stable doses of metformin with or without a SGLT2 inhibitor, and with a BMI of 23·0 to 2 were randomly assigned (5:1) to oral zenagamtide or placebo using a randomisation and trial supplies management system, then further randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three dose groups (6, 25, or 50 mg). Participants assigned to placebo were similarly assigned to matched placebo regimens corresponding to each dosing schedule. Randomisation was stratified by HbA1c (1c from baseline to week 36. The primary outcome was assessed in all randomly assigned participants using the efficacy estimand based on on-treatment data without rescue medication. Safety outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned participants exposed to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 915 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free