Evidence Hub

HRS-7535 for Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Guo L, Sun Z, Zhang L, Qin G, Li Y, Chen X, Xu N, Su X et al.

JAMA network open, 2026

194 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Importance: Oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may address limitations of injectable and peptide-based agents for type 2 diabetes.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of HRS-7535, an oral nonpeptide GLP-1 RA, as add-on therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.

Design, setting, and participants: This 16-week, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at 44 centers in China. Adults aged 18 to 75 years with type 2 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels ranging from 7.5% to 11.0%, and receiving stable metformin therapy were enrolled between May 10 and December 18, 2023. Data were analyzed from May 8 to 22, 2024.

Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to once-daily oral HRS-7535 (15, 30, 60, or 90 mg) or matching placebo. The 60- and 90-mg treatment groups used dose-escalation regimens.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 16. Secondary outcomes included changes in fasting plasma glucose level, 2-hour postprandial glucose level, body weight, and the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c levels less than 7.0%. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), hypoglycemia, and AEs of special interest.

Results: Of 194 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 52.3 [11.0] years; 115 [59.3%] men; mean [SD] HbA1c level, 8.5% [0.7]), 177 (91.2%) completed treatment. The mean changes in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 194 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free