Evidence Hub

Impact of iGlarLixi on Glycaemic Control Depth and Variability in Asian Pacific People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of LixiLan-O-AP and LixiLan-L-CN

Ni J, Lu J, Gao F, Li M, Zhang M, Du Q, Kang L, Peng D et al.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the impact of iGlarLixi on the depth of glycaemic control, glycaemic variability (GV) and postprandial glucose (PPG) control versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) or lixisenatide (Lixi) in Asian Pacific individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Materials and methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted of two phase 3 trials in individuals with suboptimally controlled T2D on oral antidiabetic drugs (LixiLan-O-AP) or basal insulin (LixiLan-L-CN). Outcomes were evaluated from baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT; Week 24 or 30, respectively). Using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) profiles, glycaemic control depth was assessed via derived time in tight range (dTITR; 3.9-7.8 mmol/L). GV was evaluated using standard deviation (SD) of SMBG, high blood glucose index (HBGI), mean absolute glucose (MAG), and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE). PPG at 0.5, 1, and 2 h was measured via standardised meal tests.

Results: From baseline to EOT, iGlarLixi provided greater increases in dTITR versus iGlar (least squares mean difference 15.03%) or Lixi (29.14%) in LixiLan-O-AP, and versus iGlar (15.93%) in LixiLan-L-CN. At EOT, > 50% dTITR rate was 67.2%, 41.1% and 26.5% with iGlarLixi, iGlar and Lixi in LixiLan-O-AP, respectively, and 53.6% and 26.4% with iGlarLixi and iGlar in LixiLan-L-CN. iGlarLixi provided generally greater reductions in SD of SMBG, HBGI, MAG, MAGE and 0.5-, 1- and 2-h PPG versus iGlar or Lixi and greater 2-h PPG < 10.0 mmol/L achievement…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free