Evidence Hub

Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study

Gerber F, Gupta R, Sanchez-Samaniego G, Lejone TI, Tahirsylaj T, Raeber F, Saavedra EB, Esquivel-Valdés I et al.

BMC medicine, 2026

785 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes poses a growing public health burden in low- and middle-income countries, where major gaps in access to chronic care persist. Task-shifting to Community Health Workers (CHWs) and the use of digital clinical decision support systems may bridge these gaps. Randomized trials evaluating CHW-led care models in which CHWs initiate, titrate, and monitor first-line diabetes treatment are lacking.

Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomised trial nested within the ComBaCaL (Community-Based Chronic Care Lesotho) cohort (NCT05596773). The cohort spans 103 rural villages in Lesotho, managed by trained, supervised CHWs. After home-based screening of cohort participants ≥40 years old or with body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, all with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the trial. In intervention villages, CHWs - guided by a tablet-based clinical decision support system - provided care, including initiation and monitoring of metformin, atorvastatin and aspirin. In control villages, participants were referred to facility-based care. The primary analysis included participants with uncomplicated and uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/l) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 12 months.

Results: From 13 May 2023 to 31 January 2024, 5'785 cohort participants were screened, 252 (4·4%) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and 103 (51 control, 52 intervention) included in the primary analysis (73·8% female, mean age 62·3 ± 12·8 years, mean HbA1c 7·2 ± 1·4%). At 12…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 785 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free