Evidence Hub

Harnessing nanomaterials to overcome antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive bacteria: a systematic review

Olalekan John Okesanya, Tolutope Adebimpe Oso, Uthman Okikiola Adebayo, Oluwatobi Babajide Ayelaagbe, Khalifat Boluwatife Obadeyi, Moyosore Esther Ogunmuyiwa-James, Abdulrahman Kayode Yahaya, Clement Ngele Chukwu et al.

Exploration of Drug Science, 2026

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Gram-positive bacteria has emerged as a significant global health threat, with pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) exhibiting increasing resistance to conventional antibiotics. This systematic review evaluates new advances in nanomaterial-based antimicrobial agents as innovative solutions to combat AMR in Gram-positive bacteria. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, studies published between 2014 and 2024 were systematically screened and analysed from databases including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and HINARI. From an initial 1,405 articles, 131 experimental studies that met the inclusion criteria were systematically analysed to harness the advances in nanomaterial-based antimicrobial agents in combating AMR in Gram-positive bacteria. Results: The included studies demonstrated that various nanomaterials, including silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), copper and copper oxide nanoparticles (Cu/CuO NPs), as well as polymeric and hybrid systems, exhibited potent antibacterial and antibiofilm activities. Key mechanisms of action included bacterial membrane disruption, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, intracellular interference, and targeted drug delivery. Many nanomaterials showed enhanced efficacy and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free