Evidence Hub

Diagnostic Performance and Safety Profile of Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

M. Ali, U. Ghori, M. Wayne, Eugene Shostak, J. D. de Cárdenas

Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2023

74 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE

Conventional electromagnetic navigation (ENB) and other guided bronchoscopic modalities have a very desirable safety profile but their diagnostic yield is only 60-70% for pulmonary lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) platforms have been introduced to improve the diagnostic performance of bronchoscopic modalities.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance and safety profile of RAB (shape-sensing and electromagnetic navigation-based platforms), by performing a systematic review and meta-analysisMethods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched to find studies that had reported on the diagnostic performance and/or the safety profile of one of the RAB systems. The quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc version 20.118. Pooled diagnostic yield was calculated using a Freeman-Tukey transformation. We planned to use random effects model if the I² index was > 40%.

RESULTS

25 studies were included in our study: 20 (diagnostic and safety analyses), 5 (only safety analysis). The pooled diagnostic yield of RAB (20 studies, 1779 lesions) was 84.3% (95% CI 81.1-87.2). I2 index was 65.6%. Based on our subgroup analyses the heterogeneity was likely driven by the differences in the study designs (prospective vs. retrospective) and procedural protocols (such as different RAB systems). Lesion size > 2cm, presence of a CT-bronchus sign, and concentric radial-EBUS view were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free